The other day, D.J. Grothe, who evidently was spending a nice vacation with his beau, Thomas, in Mexico, posted an interesting tale of trying to do good and ending up with a big mess - a nice example of the Law of Unintended Consequences. For those not having access to D.J.'s Facebook, he and Thomas tried to feed some dogs and ended up causing a horrible dogfight, where one of the canines was probably killed by the others over the food that was offered.
Not in the same vein but also an example of unintended consequences, I got a nice e-mail from one of my readers/friends just yesterday.
My friend tells me that my blog as well as the links posted in it have helped him sort out his doubts and beliefs and now, as a rational christian, he is more secure of his faith in God. He says he has run the full gamut from believer to agnostic and is now safe and happy on his christian belief.
Well, I am puzzled but, truthfully, very happy for my friend.
As I have matured as a skeptic and agnostic, I have learned not to pick fights over religion or belief. I am "embedded" in a very conservative, catholic family and it is to my advantage not to get into arguments one way or another. If anything, seeing my (mostly political) family attend their various religious rituals and functions has pushed me further into agnosticism and I flirt with atheism all the time but I don't quarrel with their beliefs.
In fact, as I have mentioned before, I don't have a problem with people being religious. Organized religion tends to piss me off but people attending religious services and having their particular sets of beliefs, well, you can chalk that one up to freedom of speech, which I am 100% for.
And having read Dawkins and Harris, I have consciously decided not to be a militant atheist.
My initial purpose in writing this blog was to try and organize my ideas and philosophy into one coherent body. All the crazy things spinning in my head had to be given some kind of structure and the blog has helped me do that. In fact, going back over the initial postings, I see how my perspective has changed.
I continue to have fun with pastafarianism and will go on making fun of mormon's underwear or catholicism ritual cannibalism, not forgetting Corny's absolutely idiotic rantings. But I have come to feel secure in my ideas and content with other's beliefs... as long as they don't try to infringe on my personal space.
So, again, I was puzzled by my friend's e-mails but very happy that I was able to help. There is no doubt in my mind that the pursuit of happiness is one noble goal and part of that happiness is being secure and safe in your beliefs. If my writings help one way or another, well then, the golden rule is in action! And friends are always a blessing, however you want to interpret the word.
Thanks Ed!
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
...for example, now I am searching about unintended consecuenses topic, so I am sure was not your main intentiont...
Si un hombre no pudo haber hecho otra cosa distinta de la que en realidad hizo, entonces no es responsable por su acción. Pero si el determinismo es verdadero, es verdadero de cada acción que el agente no pudo haber hecho de otra forma. Por lo tanto, si el determinismo es verdadero, nadie es responsable de lo que ha hecho.
Fortunately for us humanists, who believe in personal responsibility, determinism is (apparently) not real... we are responsible for our actions.
Post a Comment